CATs Home
What is a CAT?
CAT Mentors
Search CATs Library
Submit a CAT
Clinical CAT videos
Evidence-based Practice Program
Dental School Home
Skip Navigation
University:
Home
|
Calendar
|
Maps
CATs Home
What is a CAT?
CAT Mentors
Search CATs Library
Submit a CAT
Clinical CAT videos
Evidence-based Practice Program
Dental School Home
ORAL HEALTH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROGRAM
Search Results
Title
Published on
Author
Posterior Ceramics are less affected by bruxism with a greater longevity than posterior direct composite resins. (CAT#2408)
03/25/2013
Maya M. Garcia
There Is No Significant Difference Between The Longevity Of A Directly Placed, Fine Particle Hybrid (Filtek Z250) Resin Composite And Ceramic Inlays When Restoring Posterior Teeth (CAT#761)
04/14/2011
Shinyoung Kang
Insufficient Evidence To Compare Longevity Of Ceramic Restoration vs. Amalgam For Restoring Posterior Teeth (CAT#866)
04/14/2011
Annie Yi Han
Similar Clinical Performance Of Direct Resin Composite Restorations And Indirect Composite Inlays (CAT#862)
04/08/2011
Amir Hassan
Dental Amalgam Has A Lower Failure Rate In Restoring Dental Caries Compare To Composite (CAT#624)
04/02/2010
Hoda Ghanizadeh
Similar Longevity Of Gold Inlays Compared To CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays (CAT#576)
04/01/2010
Shannon Dobelbower
Resin-Based Composite Inlays Perform Marginally Better Than Porcelain Inlays (CAT#531)
03/26/2010
Steven Hogan