ORAL HEALTH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROGRAM

Search Results

TitlePublished onAuthor
Vital Pulp Therapy for Adult Patients with Deep Carious Lesions Is a Viable Short-Term Alternative to Root Canal Therapy (CAT#3280)11/20/2017Julie A Anderson
For Postmortem Identification of Incinerated Remains, Amalgam Is More Resistant to Morphological Change when Compared to Resin Composites (CAT#3144)03/23/2017Heather Burbick
CBCT Appears To Be More Accurate than Intraoral Radiographs in Detecting Artificially Created Recurrent Caries (CAT#3112)11/21/2016Nada Kordab, DDS
Clinical Success of Endodontic Microsurgery at 1 Year Is Predictive of Long Term Success (CAT#3101)11/01/2016Cameron Ritter
Coronal Pulpotomy Can Be an Effective Alternative to Conventional Root Canal Treatment (CAT#3044)04/29/2016Octavio Garcia, MD
In A Xerostomic Patient, Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials Are More Successful At Preventing Future Secondary Caries Than Amalgam, Unless The Patient Has Good Oral Hygiene That Includes Daily Fluoride Gel Application, Making Both Fluoride-Releasing and Non-Fluoride-Releasing Materials Comparable (CAT#3032)03/22/2016Alexis Keaton
Use of MTA Over Geristore for Repair of Teeth with Furcal Perforations (CAT#2908)11/18/2015Nidhi Kotak, DDS
Patients with Amalgam Restorations Are Not at a Significantly Greater Risk for Developing Health Complications Than Those With Composite Restorations (CAT#2789)11/25/2014David Quaid Faltys
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement May Be More Effective Than Amalgam at Reducing the Amount of Enamel Demineralization/Recurrent Caries Occurring at the Margins of Class II Restorations in Primary Molars (CAT#2644)02/28/2014Rodolfo Cereceres
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Has Demonstrated Similar Levels of Survival Rate and Efficacy When Compared to Conventional Amalgam Fillings (CAT#2643)02/24/2014Nathaniel Galloway
Pilot Data Suggests Use of Ultrasound Will Be Effective in Diagnosis of Incomplete Crown Fracture in The Future (CAT#2551)08/06/2013Dionte R. Moncrief
Amalgam Versus Resin Composite Restorative Materials to Prevent Secondary Caries Via Antibacterial Properties (CAT#2456)03/03/2013Kyle Poupart
Mercury Leakage from Amalgam Restorations due to Carbamide Peroxide (CAT#2393)03/01/2013Shingmei Chang
Amalgmbond And Threaded Pins Provide Equivalent Rates Of Retention Separately And Greater Retention In Combination (CAT#2264)04/13/2012Kyle Halberstadt
For Preventing Caries Around Restorations in High Caries Risk Patients, Resin Modified Glass Ionomers may be the choice (CAT#2172)02/24/2012Aaron Glick
Amalgam May Not Be More Stable Than Composite Resin When Used As Rest Seat (CAT#2169)02/12/2012Anwar Khan
Retrograde-Filling with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate After Endodontic Surgery Exhibits High Success Rates (CAT#2133)08/23/2011Nikita B. Ruparel
Ideal Core Build-Up Material As An Interim Restoration (CAT#890)05/09/2011Vidhi Sheth
Does Polishing An Amalgam Restoration Intraorally Improve The Marginal Integrity Of The Restoration? (CAT#871)04/28/2011Matt Sager
Restoration Materials In Dry Mouth Patients (CAT#789)04/14/2011Meagan D. Garcia
Insufficient Evidence To Compare Longevity Of Ceramic Restoration vs. Amalgam For Restoring Posterior Teeth (CAT#866)04/14/2011Annie Yi Han
Fracture Resistance Of Large Amalgam Bonded Restorations Compared To Smaller Restorations (CAT#844)04/08/2011Christopher Balser
Xerostomia And Its Effects On Dental Restorative Materials (CAT#847)04/01/2011Blaine Wieck
Composite Restorations Have a Higher Frequency of Repair Compared to Amalgam Restorations When Placed in Posterior Permanent Teeth in Pediatric Patients (CAT#768)03/30/2011Mary Ruth Cacho
OptiBond SOLO Adhesive Has Less Microleakage Than Amalgambond Plus (CAT#820)03/30/2011Chad Riggs
Glass Ionomer Restorations Of Root Surface Caries Are More Resistant To Recurrent Caries Than Amalgam In Fluoride Users (CAT#770)03/15/2011Judy Suh
Chlorine Containing Water Line Disinfectants/Cleaners Used in Dental Offices Release Mercury (CAT#604)05/12/2010Tom A. Samuel
Amalgam and Resin Composite Fillings Show Equal Failure Rates in Small Posterior Restorations while Amalgam Shows Better Survival than Composite if used for large posterior restorations. (CAT#591)04/30/2010Lourdes Willhite
Similar Longevity of Bonded Amalgam Restorations and Conventionally Retained Amalgam Restorations over 2 Years (CAT#633)04/14/2010Ryan Robbins
Similar Success of Bonded Amalgam vs. Pin-Retained Restorations for Complex Amalgams Restorations (CAT#606)04/07/2010Mohammad Arsalan Khan
Similar Survival Rates Of Bonded Amalgam And Non-bonded Amalgam Restorations (CAT#630)04/05/2010Yen Hong Lai
Dental Amalgam Has A Lower Failure Rate In Restoring Dental Caries Compare To Composite (CAT#624)04/02/2010Hoda Ghanizadeh
Longevity of Dental Amalgam and Resin Composite is Comparable (CAT#602)04/02/2010Erica Williams
Resin Composite Build Up (CAT#562)03/31/2010William Henderson
Applying Adhesive Techniques Over Darkened Dentin Can Decrease Bond Strength (CAT#541)03/30/2010My Hanh Bui
Stainless Steel Crowns vs Amalgam In Pediatric Patients (CAT#620)03/30/2010Yusif Mohammad
The use of dental amalgam in a posterior dental restoration exhibits slight superiority in the overall success of the restoration when compared with resin bonded composites (CAT#523)01/20/2010Christen Kartaltepe
Retention of large amalgam restorations with amalgam pins and Amalgambond (CAT#513)01/14/2010Erin E. Williams
Pin-Retained and Bonded Amalgam Restorations Show Similar Clinical Failure Rates (CAT#486)01/07/2010Seth Larson
Improved Longevity of Large Amalgam Restorations in the Posterior teeth of Children Compared with Composite Restorations (CAT#504)01/07/2010Emily Whittington