| Title |
Which Lasts Longer: Implant or FPD? |
| Clinical Question |
In an otherwise healthy adult patient missing just one tooth, does a fixed partial denture or an implant-supported crown last longer? |
| Clinical Bottom Line |
When other factors are the same, single implant-supported crowns last longer on average than fixed partial dentures. |
| Best Evidence |
|
| PubMed ID |
Author / Year |
Patient Group |
Study type
(level of evidence) |
| 17936128 | Torabinejad/2007 | Included 46 ISC papers and 31 FPD papers out of 7701 papers identified | Systematic Review with Meta-analysis | | Key results | After 6+ years, the weighted success rates were 80% (79-82 95% CI) for FPD restorations and 97% (96-98 95% CI) for ISC restorations. | |
| Evidence Search |
Using PubMed, searched: "Denture, Partial, Fixed"[Mesh] AND "Dental Implants"[Mesh] AND survival |
Comments on
The Evidence |
This systematic review compared not only FPD and implant-supported crowns but also no treatment for an edentulous space as well as root canal therapy and subsequent crown placement when the tooth in question had not been extracted yet. |
| Applicability |
These findings would apply to most adult patients with adequate health and alveolar bone for dental implant placement who are missing a single tooth. |
| Specialty |
(General Dentistry) (Restorative Dentistry) |
| Keywords |
Implant, Bridge, Survival, Fixed Partial Denture
|
| ID# |
901 |
| Date of submission |
05/17/2011 |
| E-mail |
francisj@livemail.uthscsa.edu |
| Author |
J. Christian Francis |
| Co-author(s) |
|
| Co-author(s) e-mail |
|
| Faculty mentor |
Nataliya Verona, DDS, PhD |
| Faculty mentor e-mail |
|
| |
|
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?) |
| None available | |
 |
Comments and Evidence-Based Updates on the CAT
(FOR PRACTICING DENTISTS', FACULTY, RESIDENTS and/or STUDENTS COMMENTS ON PUBLISHED CATs) |
by Mackenzi McAfee and Christopher Beard (San Antonio, TX) on 11/28/2017 A PubMed search on implant and FPD survival rates was done in November 2017. A more recent publication on the question was located: Muddugangadhar 2015, PubMed: 26435609. This systematic review with meta-analysis of 63 prospective and retrospective cohort studies showed similar results; it showed that single implant-supported crowns have overall higher 5-year survival rates than implant-supported FPDs. However, this more recent research included implant tooth-supported prostheses as well. | |