| Title |
Reduction of Crestal Bone Loss With Placement of Platform Switching Implant |
| Clinical Question |
What is the effect of platform switching vs. platform matching implants in regard to crestal bone loss? |
| Clinical Bottom Line |
The use of platform switching implants has been shown to minimize crestal bone loss when compared to platform matching implants. |
| Best Evidence |
|
| PubMed ID |
Author / Year |
Patient Group |
Study type
(level of evidence) |
| 26723496 | Santiago/2016 | 1098 patients in 25 studies (17 RCTs and 8 prospective studies) with total of 2266 implants. | Systematic review and meta-analysis | | Key results | 18 out of 25 studies showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the use of platform switching implants for bone preservation. Meta-analysis, based on the full 25 study groups, showed a significant bone loss for the control group compared with the platform switching group.(MD −0.41 mm (95% CI −0.52 to −0.29, P < 0.00001)) | | 24819807 | Herekar/2014 | 15 studies (10 RCTs and 5 CCTs) with total of 1683 implants. | Study Type Systematic review and Meta-analysis | | Key results | Marginal bone loss around platform-switched implants was significantly less than platform-matched implants [MD]: -0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.37 to -0.30; P < 0.00001)” | | 26847169 | Rocha/2016 | 63 patients with total of 135 implants. | Randomized Controlled Trial | | Key results | From surgery to 36 months, the mean bone loss was 0.28 ± 0.56 mm for the platform-switching group and 0.68 ± 0.64 mm for the platform-matching group. | |
| Evidence Search |
Platform switching implant AND marginal bone OR crestal bone. |
Comments on
The Evidence |
Validity: The best evidence on the platform switching implant included meta-analysis, systematic review, and RCTs. The validity of each study included in the meta-analysis and systematic review was assessed using the Jadad scale. They were classified on a scale of 0–5, with a score above 3 indicating an appropriate study. |
| Applicability |
Platform switching dental implant use is applicable for general, prosthodontic, periodontic dentists and oral surgeons. The evidence has shown its effectiveness in minimizing crestal bone loss. |
| Specialty |
(General Dentistry) (Oral Surgery) (Periodontics) (Prosthodontics) (Restorative Dentistry) |
| Keywords |
Dental implants, Platform switching, Crestal bone loss, Marginal bone loss.
|
| ID# |
3285 |
| Date of submission |
10/27/2017 |
| E-mail |
alhugail@livemail.uthscsa.edu |
| Author |
Arwa Al Hugail |
| Co-author(s) |
|
| Co-author(s) e-mail |
|
| Faculty mentor |
|
| Faculty mentor e-mail |
|
| |
|
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?) |
| None available | |
 |
Comments and Evidence-Based Updates on the CAT
(FOR PRACTICING DENTISTS', FACULTY, RESIDENTS and/or STUDENTS COMMENTS ON PUBLISHED CATs) |
| None available | |