Title |
In Patients with Moderate Malocclusion, Orthodontic Treatment Provides No Significant Improvement to Periodontal Health |
Clinical Question |
In patients with moderate malocclusion, would orthodontic treatment provide long-term periodontal benefits, as measured by pocket depths and gingival recession? |
Clinical Bottom Line |
Although some studies have suggested that malocclusion can have adverse effects on the periodontium, current evidence does not recommend correcting this malocclusion to improve one’s long-term periodontal health. At this time, orthodontics is only a valuable treatment for improving esthetics in individuals with malocclusion. This conclusion is supported by a meta-analysis of 5 studies. |
Best Evidence |
|
PubMed ID |
Author / Year |
Patient Group |
Study type
(level of evidence) |
18385025 | Bollen/2008 | 2 studies on pocket depth and 3 studies on gingival recession | Meta-Analysis | Key results | After completing a hand and electronic search of articles dating back to 1980, only one randomized controlled trial and 11 non-randomized studies were determined to meet the study’s criteria. Of the 12 studies comparing those with and without orthodontic treatment, 3 studies reported slightly increased gingival recession (mean difference=0.03 mm, p=0.0001) in the treatment group and 2 studies reported slightly deeper pocket depths (mean difference=0.23 mm, p=0.00001) in the treatment group. At this time, the evidence suggests that correcting malocclusion with orthodontics does not improve one's long-term periodontal health. | |
Evidence Search |
(effects[All Fields] AND orthodontic[All Fields] AND ("therapy"[Subheading] OR "therapy"[All Fields] OR "therapeutics"[MeSH Terms] OR "therapeutics"[All Fields]) AND periodontal[All Fields] AND ("health"[MeSH Terms] OR "health"[All Fields])) AND (Comparative Study[ptyp] OR systematic[sb] OR Meta-Analysis[ptyp] OR Review[ptyp]) |
Comments on
The Evidence |
Validity:
The evidence in the meta-analysis was found to have a moderate amount of bias and considered of low-quality because follow-up time after orthodontic treatment varied, control groups included individuals without malocclusion, and adjustments were not made for socioeconomic status, personal oral hygiene habits, and smoking.
Perspective:
Based on Bollen et. al., orthodontic therapy does not provide significant benefits to long-term periodontal health. However, these studies focus on young to middle-aged adults and do not assess the periodontal outcomes that may become more apparent later in adulthood. Although the studies evaluate a sufficient number of patients, future studies could provide more reliable and conclusive evidence by decreasing bias and adjusting for the variability in both the study and control group.
|
Applicability |
Although many practicing dentists claim correcting malocclusion can provide long-term periodontal benefits to their patients, evidence has not shown this to be true. In patients with malocclusion, orthodontic treatment should only be recommended for esthetic purposes. |
Specialty |
(General Dentistry) (Orthodontics) (Periodontics) (Dental Hygiene) |
Keywords |
Malocclusion, Periodontal disease, Pocket depth, Gingival Recession
|
ID# |
2740 |
Date of submission |
06/25/2014 |
E-mail |
nguyent16@livemail.uthscsa.edu |
Author |
Teresa Nguyen |
Co-author(s) |
Saad Almujel, Abdulmohsen Mohammed Alqasir |
Co-author(s) e-mail |
saadalmojel@yahoo.com, abood6000@gmail.com |
Faculty mentor |
Clarence C. Bryk, DDS, MS |
Faculty mentor e-mail |
brykc@uthscsa.edu |
|
|
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?) |
None available | |
 |
Comments and Evidence-Based Updates on the CAT
(FOR PRACTICING DENTISTS', FACULTY, RESIDENTS and/or STUDENTS COMMENTS ON PUBLISHED CATs) |
None available | |