| Title |
Fluoride Retention Greater if no Post Brushing Water Rinsing Routine is Used |
| Clinical Question |
In adults, does not rinsing with water after brushing teeth with fluoride toothpaste versus rinsing after brushing teeth with fluoride toothpaste increase fluoride retention? |
| Clinical Bottom Line |
Fluoride retention is greater without post brushing water rinsing compared to rinsing with water after brushing with fluoride toothpaste. |
| Best Evidence |
|
| PubMed ID |
Author / Year |
Patient Group |
Study type
(level of evidence) |
| 19204390 | Nordstom/2009 | 26 healthy, aged 19- | Randomized Controlled trial, 4-leg | | Key results | Fluoride retention in plaque and saliva was highest after using 5,000 ppm F toothpaste without post brushing water rinsing compared to using 1,450 ppm F toothpaste with
water rinsing which had the lowest retention. The increase of F in plaque between 1,450/rinsing
and 5,000/no rinsing was 2.1 times (2.7/1.3) expressed as ppm F and 2.75 (0.11/0.04) times
expressed on a weight basis (both, p<0.05). The increase of F in saliva using toothpaste with
5,000 ppm F without postbrushing water rinsing was 4.2 times (685/165; p< 0.001) compared to
1,450 ppm F toothpaste with water rinsing. | | 11813383 | Sjogren/2001 | 21 healthy, aged 23 | Randomized Controlled Trial | | Key results | In saliva, the concentration of fluoride increased as an effect of the increased volume of water, but not as an effect of duration of rinsing (p=0.023). The difference in fluoride concentration in saliva was significant with respect to the amount of water (10mLx3 compared to 5mL at various rinsing times; p<0.05) and compared to fluoride-free brushing (p<0.001). | | 14684972 | Issa/2004 | 10 healthy adults | Double-blind study | | Key results | Using AmF toothpaste (1,400 ppm F) resulted in the highest fluoride content of saliva without water rinsing after 120 min (0.52 ppm F, Cl 0.23, 0.81). | |
| Evidence Search |
“Fluoride retention with water rinsing after toothbrushing” a second search used “Rinsing with water after brushing teeth.” Both used the same filters on PubMed, English, clinical trial, randomized control trial, humans, 5 or 10 years, abstract or full text available. |
Comments on
The Evidence |
Patient groups could be larger. However, the articles all supported the notion that fluoride retention is greater with no post brushing rinsing routine is. |
| Applicability |
In order to achieve the maximum anticaries effect from home care, there should be emphasis on post brushing routines. Applies especially to patients who are at risk of developing caries. |
| Specialty |
(General Dentistry) (Orthodontics) (Pediatric Dentistry) (Periodontics) (Dental Hygiene) |
| Keywords |
Fluoride, Toothbrushing, Water rinsing, Dentifrice, Saliva, Dental plaque
|
| ID# |
2493 |
| Date of submission |
07/25/2013 |
| E-mail |
stoker@ohsu.edu |
| Author |
Amelia Stoker |
| Co-author(s) |
|
| Co-author(s) e-mail |
|
| Faculty mentor |
Ronald Sakaguchi, DDS, MS. PhD, MBA & Eli Schwarz, DDS, MPH, PhD |
| Faculty mentor e-mail |
schwarz@ohsu.edu; sakaguch@ohsu.edu |
| |
|
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?) |
| None available | |
 |
Comments and Evidence-Based Updates on the CAT
(FOR PRACTICING DENTISTS', FACULTY, RESIDENTS and/or STUDENTS COMMENTS ON PUBLISHED CATs) |
| None available | |