Title |
Maternal Smoking Increases The Risk For Craniocynostosis And Oral Clefts |
Clinical Question |
Does maternal smoking during pregnancy cause Craniocynostosis and Oral Clefts? |
Clinical Bottom Line |
Maternal smoking during pregnancy leads to a 33% increased risk of Craniocynostosis and 28-34% increased risk of oral clefts. |
Best Evidence |
|
PubMed ID |
Author / Year |
Patient Group |
Study type
(level of evidence) |
21747128 | Hackshaw/2011 | 173,687 malformed cases. 11.7 million control cases | Systematic Review | Key results | The Odds Ratio for craniocynostosis in infants, exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy, is 1.33 (95% CI 1.03-1.73, P=0.03) with evidence of a dose-response relationship. The Pooled Odds Ratio for Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate is 1.28 (95% CI 1.20-1.36, p<0.00001) with evidence of a dose-response relationship. | 15112010 | Little/2004 | 24 Case-control and Cohort studies | Meta-anlaysis of case control and cohort studies | Key results | The Odds Ratio for cleft Lip with or without cleft palate in infants, exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy, is 1.34 (95% CI 1.25-1.44). The Odds Ratio for Cleft Palate alone is 1.22 (95% CI 1.10-1.35). Both with evidence of a dose-response relationship. | |
Evidence Search |
(pregnancy AND smoking AND (craniosynostosis OR cleft)) OR ("Pregnancy"[Mesh] AND "Smoking"[Mesh] AND ("Craniosynostoses"[Mesh] OR "Cleft Lip"[Mesh] OR "Cleft Palate"[Mesh])) |
Comments on
The Evidence |
The systematic review and meta-analysis are typically the highest levels of evidence however, these consist of case control/cohort studies. Randomized control studies will most likely never be available so these lower level experiments will suffice. The systematic review had a large sample. The meta analysis also used a large number of studies from which to do its analysis. Both studies show evidence that the risk of these defects increased with increasing cigarette consumption. |
Applicability |
The findings of these studies are highly applicable. Despite the evidence against maternal smoking during pregnancy, a high percentage of women continue to smoke during pregnancy (14-17% in western society). These defects are very expensive and difficult to treat and manage, and the psychological effects are un-measurable. The associated risk is significant enough to push for more advertising against this dangerous practice. |
Specialty |
(Public Health) (Oral Surgery) (Orthodontics) (Pediatric Dentistry) (Behavioral Science) |
Keywords |
Maternal Smoking, Craniocynostosis, Oral Clefts, Birth Defects, Tobacco
|
ID# |
2162 |
Date of submission |
10/10/2011 |
E-mail |
pratta@livemail.uthscsa.edu |
Author |
Allen Pratt, DDS |
Co-author(s) |
|
Co-author(s) e-mail |
|
Faculty mentor |
Peter T. Gakunga, BDS, MS, PhD |
Faculty mentor e-mail |
GAKUNGA@uthscsa.edu |
|
|
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?) |
None available | |
|
Comments and Evidence-Based Updates on the CAT
(FOR PRACTICING DENTISTS', FACULTY, RESIDENTS and/or STUDENTS COMMENTS ON PUBLISHED CATs) |
by Thomas Adams and Priscilla Leary (San Antonio, Texas) on 11/28/2017 A Pub-Med search on this topic in November 2017, found a meta-analysis by Xuan et al. 2016(PMID 27727103.) which came to similar conclusions as the original bottom line for this CAT. The conclusions further confirmed a risk between smoking and cleft defects, but couldn't confirm if the risk increased depending on dose. | |