View the CAT printer-friendly / share this CAT
Title Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Superior to Calcium Hydroxide in Pulpotomized Primary Molars
Clinical Question In pulpotomized primary dentition, does Mineral Trioxide Aggregate produce superior results as compared to Calcium Hydroxide?
Clinical Bottom Line Mineral Trioxide Aggregate yielded superior results when used in primary molars in both radiographic and clinical findings.
Best Evidence (you may view more info by clicking on the PubMed ID link)
PubMed ID Author / Year Patient Group Study type
(level of evidence)
#1) 22319753Liu/201117 childrenRandomized Controlled Trial
Key resultsIn the treatment primary molars with MTA, the success rate was 94.1% with crown discoloration being the common complaint. In primary molars treated with Calcium Hydroxide, internal root resorption was the most common cause of failure.
#2) 18534173Ng/2008childrenMeta-Analysis
Key resultsA clinical common odds ratio of 6.48 with a confidence interval of 1.75-24 comparing MTA successes to CH; subsequently, radiographic common odds ratio yielded 10.47 with a confidence interval of 3.35-32.76 revealing the superiority of MTA as compared to CH.
Evidence Search "calcium hydroxide mta primary molars"
Comments on
The Evidence
In the study by Liu of 17 children in a randomized controlled trial, 17 contralateral molars were evaluated after treatment of MTA and CH. The common cause of failures was internal root resorption when treated with CH while crown discoloration was noted with MTA. In the meta-analysis conducted by Ng, MTA was compared to CH in 531 molars, yielding superior results in both clinical and radiographic findings. There were nine randomized controlled trials and seven controlled trials in the meta-analysis study.
Applicability Mineral Trioxide Aggregate can be used with as the superior choice of treatment in pulpotomized primary molars.
Specialty/Discipline (Pediatric Dentistry)
Keywords Mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide, pulpotomized
ID# 2415
Date of submission: 03/07/2013spacer
E-mail kingk5@uthscsa.edu
Author Kyle King
Co-author(s) e-mail
Faculty mentor/Co-author Adriana Segura, DDS, MS
Faculty mentor/Co-author e-mail SEGURAA@uthscsa.edu
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?)
post a rationale
None available
Comments on the CAT
post a comment
None available

Return to Found CATs list