View the CAT printer-friendly / share this CAT
Title Water-Lift Balloon System For Sinus Augmentation Results In Less Perforations Than Traditional Lateral Approach With Piezoelectric Surgery
Clinical Question Does the crestal approach with water-lift balloon system result in less sinus perforations than the lateral approach using piezoelectric surgery?
Clinical Bottom Line For sinus augmentations, the water-lift system reduces the number of sinus perforations compared to traditional lateral window with piezo surgery, (0/25 vs. 6/25). Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the above finding. Future studies performed at institutions without ties to the author, who is the inventor of the sinus infiltration device, are needed.
Best Evidence (you may view more info by clicking on the PubMed ID link)
PubMed ID Author / Year Patient Group Study type
(level of evidence)
#1) 21592728Bensaha/201150 patients requiring sinus augmentation prior to implant placementRandomized Controlled Trial
Key resultsThere was a statistically significant difference in the number of perforations between the two techniques: Water-lift = 0/25, Lateral approach with piezoelectric surgery= 6/25 (p=0.01).
Evidence Search ("nasal mucosa"[MeSH Terms] OR ("nasal"[All Fields] AND "mucosa"[All Fields]) OR "nasal mucosa"[All Fields] OR ("schneiderian"[All Fields] AND "membrane"[All Fields]) OR "schneiderian membrane"[All Fields]) AND ("water"[MeSH Terms] OR "water"[All Fields]) AND ("lifting"[MeSH Terms] OR "lifting"[All Fields] OR "lift"[All Fields])
Comments on
The Evidence
This randomized controlled trial had similar group distribution at the onset of the study with 100% completion rate. 50 subjects were followed during the course of sinus augmentation. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: 25 subjects treated via lateral approach with piezoelectric surgery, 25 treated via crestal approach with water-lift infiltration. Membrane integrity was evaluated by having the patient perform a Valsalva maneuver at the time of surgery (the effectiveness of this test is under debate). The author of this study is the inventor of the sinus infiltration device.
Applicability The study included adult patients,
Specialty/Discipline (Oral Surgery) (Periodontics)
Keywords Schneiderian membrane, water lift, sinus augmentation, dental implants
ID# 2110
Date of submission: 09/09/2011spacer
E-mail frostn@uthscsa.edu
Author Natalie A. Frost
Co-author(s) e-mail
Faculty mentor/Co-author Guy Huynh-Ba, DDS
Faculty mentor/Co-author e-mail HuynhBa@uthscsa.edu
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?)
post a rationale
None available
Comments on the CAT
post a comment
None available

Return to Found CATs list