|
Title |
Etching with 30-40% Phosphoric Acid Not Needed With Clearfil SE Bond Self-Etching Adhesive System |
Clinical Question |
In a Class V non-carious lesion, will etching with 30%-40% phosphoric acid prior to application of Clearfil SE Bond self-etch primer, as compared to a non-acid etching technique, affect clinical performance of the adhesive? |
Clinical Bottom Line |
Based on the evidence of no loss in restorations, there is no significant difference between the two techniques. Clinical performance is adequate with just the Clearfil SE Bond self-etch adhesive system. This finding cannot be applied globally to all self-etching adhesive systems. (See Comments on the CAT below) |
Best Evidence |
(you may view more info by clicking on the PubMed ID link) |
PubMed ID |
Author / Year |
Patient Group |
Study type
(level of evidence) |
#1) 19024260 | Abdalla/2008 | 125 Class V non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with incisal or occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin/cementum | Randomized Controlled Trial | Key results | No loss of restorations was recorded after 1 and 2 years for the two restorative techniques. There was no significant difference between the baseline, 1-, and 2-year results for any of the tested techniques. However, restorations made after acid etching showed less marginal discoloration at the enamel margins. | |
Evidence Search |
#1 search non- carious lesion#2 search self etching (mesh) |
Comments on
The Evidence |
This experimental study incorporated both randomization and control. A good amount of accurate evidence was carefully analyzed. |
Applicability |
These results apply to the dental practitioner’s technique when deciding to use a self-etching system for restoring non-carious lesions. |
Specialty/Discipline |
(Restorative Dentistry) |
Keywords |
Non- carious lesion, Class V lesions, self etchant
|
ID# |
797 |
Date of submission: |
03/18/2011 |
E-mail |
trevinoa10@livemail.uthscsa.edu |
Author |
Alejandro J. Trevino |
Co-author(s) |
|
Co-author(s) e-mail |
|
Faculty mentor/Co-author |
James B. Summitt, DDS, MS |
Faculty mentor/Co-author e-mail |
SUMMITT@uthscsa.edu |
Basic Science Rationale
(Mechanisms that may account for and/or explain the clinical question, i.e. is the answer to the clinical question consistent with basic biological, physical and/or behavioral science principles, laws and research?) |
post a rationale |
None available | |
|
Comments and Evidence-Based Updates on the CAT
(FOR PRACTICING DENTISTS', FACULTY, RESIDENTS and/or STUDENTS COMMENTS ON PUBLISHED CATs) |
post a comment |
by Allen Jaqhangiri, DDS () on 05/24/2011 I am really Impressed with CAT library. It is a great resource for general dentist. I found my self going over some of the hot topics that could have an effect on my everyday practice. For example, this CAT summery talks about Clearfil SE Bond self-etch adhesive system. I am a firm believer in 4th and 5th generation bonding systems. Looking at this summary, I wouldn’t mind looking into Clearfil SE bonding system for sensitive teeth and tooth brush abrasions. | |
|
|